Should Christians Imitate Animals?

3 February 2010

If you’ve ever watched a Jackie Chan flick or two, you are probably aware that there are many, many martial arts that are modeled on an imitation of one animal or another.  There are tiger styles, crane styles, preying mantis, lion, bear, monkey, snake, rooster, crab, and even dragon, phoenix and unicorn.   And many, many more.

I occasionally meet a well-meaning Christian who objects that it’s not right for a human being to cultivate the imitation of animals, and that therefore the animal stylings in martial arts should not be practiced by Christians.  God commanded us to have dominion over the creation, including the animals, and we must approach the world like men, not like subordinate creatures.  Or so goes the objection.

Obviously, we’re sinners, and we can always find a way to mess something up.  I’d like to say right up front that an animistic approach to an animal style would be a serious problem.  Adopting a totem animal, seeking a spirit guide, all those things, should be forsaken by Christians.  The question here is not whether an animal style could be wrong—obviously, yes—but whether it must be wrong.  It is possible to practice an animal style in a way that is compatible with Christian belief?

I believe it is, and I will follow two lines of argument.  The first is that the Bible itself teaches us to learn from and imitate animals, in order to be better men.  The second has to do with the biblical meaning of animals—but we’ll get there in due time.

In Solomon’s instructions to his son, he writes, “Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways and be wise.”  In the following instruction, Solomon enumerates the ways in which his son ought to be like the ant.  According to the prophet Hosea, when Yahweh describes himself going to war against Israel, he compares Himself to a lion, a leopard, and a bear.  Jesus is described as the Lamb of God and the Lion of the tribe of Judah.  If it is always bad for a human to behave like an animal, why does God say that He does?

That, really, is a sufficient answer.  If God tells us to learn lessons from animals, and compares Himself to animals when He is fighting, then why should we be afraid to learn lessons from animals about fighting?

Thus far sound, obvious theological reflection—a trifle pedestrian, perhaps, but safe enough ground.  But if we’re willing to think a little more poetically, the Scriptures give us a great deal more to think about.  This will, of course, be more indirect.  We’ll have to consider angels, creation, the meaning of animals and the role of men in the world.  But if we can follow the path the Bible lays, we may find ourselves a good deal richer for the effort.  We’ll begin with the angels.

Descriptions of angelic beings are relatively sparse in the Bible, but there are some common themes.  Consider the following:

Each one had four faces, and each one had four wings.  Their legs were straight, and the soles of their feet were like the soles of calves’ feet. They sparkled like the color of burnished bronze.  The hands of a man were under their wings on their four sides; and each of the four had faces and wings.  Their wings touched one another. The creatures did not turn when they went, but each one went straight forward.   As for the likeness of their faces, each had the face of a man; each of the four had the face of a lion on the right side, each of the four had the face of an ox on the left side, and each of the four had the face of an eagle.  (Ezekiel 1:6-10)

Before the throne there was a sea of glass, like crystal. And in the midst of the throne, and around the throne, were four living creatures full of eyes in front and in back.  The first living creature was like a lion, the second living creature like a calf, the third living creature had a face like a man, and the fourth living creature was like a flying eagle.  The four living creatures, each having six wings, were full of eyes around and within. And they do not rest day or night, saying: “Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, Who was and is and is to come!” (Revelation 4:6-8)

Descriptions of angels in the Bible draw on a variety of animal features.  Some angels appear as men, but many others appear as animals, or an odd mixture of animal parts.  Hold onto that thought for a moment, and let’s consider the order of creation.

The angels already existed when God made the earth.  We know this because when God is taking Job to task in Job 38, He says that the angels rejoiced at the earth’s creation:

Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Tell Me, if you have understanding.
Who determined its measurements?
Surely you know!
Or who stretched the line upon it?
To what were its foundations fastened?
Or who laid its cornerstone,
When the morning stars sang together,
And all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Later in the creation week, when God filled the sea and skies with fish and birds, and the land with animals, the angels were already in existence.  Which means that it isn’t so much that angels look like animals, as that animals look like angels — or angel parts.  Man is the image of God; animals are the images of angels.

Man was given the animals as part of his dominion, and although our dominion has continued to extend and improve, we are a long way from maturity.  We have mismanaged the animals God committed to our care in just about every way possible.  Some kinds of animals have gone extinct because the world is cursed for our sake; other kinds we have driven into extinction through neglect, inept management, or worse.  We have frequently swung the pendulum to the other extreme and worshiped the animals in various ways, which is just as grievous a sin.

So we have a long way to go.  But the animals are there, in part, to help us grow to maturity.  When we can lovingly manage the animals God put on earth, we will have really accomplished something.  And in eternity, it will not just be the animals God commits to our jurisdiction, but the angels they are made to resemble (1Cor.6:3).

Putting all this together, how should we think of an animal styling in martial art?  God has built lessons into the creation, in part through the animals.  So there are lessons about movement and perhaps fighting that we can learn in that way.  And in learning these lessons, we are not just learning from animals but from the earthly images of angels.

But let’s take it beyond that.  In fact, let’s consider an absolute worst-case scenario.

Let us suppose that in the jungles of Indonesia lives a minor demon resembling a bat (or, as we just learned, bats resemble the demon).  In the guise of a bat spirit he has established contact with an up-and-coming shaman, insinuating himself as the man’s spirit guide.  He guides the young man to Fork-Island Village (so named because it’s on an island in the middle of the fork in a river).  As the young shaman enters the village, the village shaman, a wizened old man, staggers out of his hut, shouts out “The bat!  The bat!” and dies.

Seizing the opportunity which his patron demon has created for him, the young shaman ensconces himself as the shaman of the village, and through his influence, the village begins to worship and sacrifice to the bat-demon.  The village champion, in collaboration with the shaman and through a series of trances where he meets the demon, begins to formulate a martial practice around bat-like motions.  The demon has been watching humanity for the whole of its history, and has learned far more than he could ever teach a human in one lifetime.  As long as the champion continues to worship him, the demon teaches him things about combat and human anatomy that he could never have otherwise learned.  The champion grows more skilled and vicious than ever, and the young men of the village beg him to teach them.  Soon they, too, are journeying into the jungle with the shaman and the champion to enter into a trance and meet the bat.

Five generations later, Fork-Island Village is large, well-defended, and prosperous.  The Bat-Style of Fork-Island Village is spoken of in hushed whispers, and its champions feared for miles around.  It is said that an adept can move in utter silence through the night, kill an adversary from across the room merely by pointing at him with his sacred blade, and disappear as though he had never been.  It is said that a true master of the Bat-Style can fly, and fall upon his enemies without warning from the night sky.  How much is truth and how much is fanciful rumor, or stories spread by the villagers themselves as psychological warfare?  No way to know.  And as it is presently taught, with worship of the bat-demon as the point of entry and a continuing, integral focus of the martial art, no Christian should study it.

But let us further suppose that some members of that village move into the cities, and thence to the West.  The father of one family converts to Christianity.  Serving only Jesus, he no longer enters trances to meet the bat.  He no longer offers sacrifices to it.  He breaks his sacred blade, dedicated to the bat, and throws it away.  But he keeps the physical practice, the movements, the knowledge of the human body’s vulnerabilities, the skills of redirection, physical deception and decoy, striking blows that penetrate deeply into the body; he’s still as adept a fighter as ever he was.

He moves in next door to you.  You go out and help them carry in boxes.  A few days later, he asks to borrow your lawnmower.  You let him.  He returns it scrubbed clean as the day you bought it, with a full tank of gas.  You invite him to church, and discover that he’s a believer.  He joins your church, your kids play and study together, and your families become friends.  One day you see him doing some funky kung-fu-looking thing in the backyard.  You ask him what he’s doing, and he tells you the story and asks you if you want to learn.

Could you, in good conscience?

Why not?  Whatever he has learned about how the human body works, how to move it and how to damage it—if it’s true, then it’s God, not the demon, who made the body that way.  He has learned truths about creation that God put into the creation to be discovered.  Those who uncovered this knowledge should have served Christ with it.  If he is now doing that, then he is doing what his ancestors—and the demon—ought to have done all along.  You have a chance to join him in that, and to be a living rebuke to the bat-demon and his worshipers, a demonstration that their secrets reveal the glory of God, as all creation does.  Why not do it?


Psalm 104: A Meditation

31 January 2010

The psalm we considered this morning covers a lot of territory, from the forces of nature to human culture, from the food the animals eat to the thoughts that men think.  In all of these things, the psalmist points to some common themes:

  • First, there are no ‘forces of nature’ in the way we commonly mean it, any more than there are ‘creations of man’ in the way we commonly mean that.  All these things come from the hand of God.
  • Second, there is only one proper response to this: to praise the Lord, and to make your thoughts sweet to Him.

We find it difficult to do this, because we focus on the things we do not like, and so zoom in on those tiny things that we refuse to see anything else.  You must praise God even for those things, and my charge to you this week is to follow the strategy of the psalmist.  Back off, look at the whole world, and praise God for all of it.  Then, in that context, re-examine your discontents, and praise God for those things too.


The Lord’s Supper, Part 2: What’s Actually Happening?

24 January 2010

Last week, we saw that the Corinthians had permitted their actual practice of the Supper to become a way of reinforcing divisions in the Body of Christ.  For this, many of them were weak and sickly, and some of them were killed.  This week I’m offering you a similar warning, not about the practice of the Supper, but about our understanding of what is happening in the Supper.

God requires us to believe His word, and sanctified imagination is absolutely necessary to faith.  But there are temptations here that we must avoid.  When you allow your imagination to carry you so far that in doctrine or in practice, you are contradicting Scripture, you have gone too far.  Even if you don’t do that, if you allow your particular way of imagining the thing to become a point of contention so that the argument divides the body, you have sinned.

There is a parallel temptation in the other direction: the temptation to say “It’s all a mystery” and then ignore the things the Scripture does say.  You must subject yourself to the discipline of the Scripture; you must believe what it says, not cultivate a sort of devotional ignorance.

And so the charge is this: Submit to the Scripture.  All of it, straight up the middle, with no fancy footwork.  Whatever the Bible teaches you to believe and do, make it a part of you.  Let your sanctified imagination roam free on the mountains of the Bible—but stay within the limits that the Bible prescribes for you. Sanctified imagination is only sanctified so long as it is obedient.


Introduction to the Lord’s Supper

17 January 2010

The Corinthians’ worship was lacking. The flaws in their practice of the Lord’s Supper in particular were very real, and glaringly obvious. Paul does not sugar-coat any of this; he tells it exactly like it is. But he does this for a purpose, and the purpose is to restore them so that they will stop dividing Christ’s body, and instead unite with each other and worship God together in a way that glorifies Him.

The evangelical world is filled with bad worship. Many believers are disregarding what they do know about God’s requirements for worship, utterly ignorant of the rest, and terribly arrogant in their disobedience—which is to say, they are like the Corinthians. Do not dare to think that this is not your problem. Christ is not divided; these people are wounded and disobedient parts of the same body that you are a part of.

At the same time, do not dare to approach the issue in an arrogant, divisive way yourself. If you do this, your reformation in worship will drive other people away from whatever you are doing—and the more truth you are applying, the more truth you will drive them away from, and the more damage you will do to the body. We must not allow our obedience to become a weapon that further fragments the body. Listen to the Lord’s leading, look for an opening, and be very, very wise. The goal is to stir people up to love and good works, not to alienate them from the very good works they should be doing.


The Image of God: Principles and Rescue

10 January 2010

We have been looking for the past few weeks at being God’s image, and at Paul’s stunning statement, “It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me.”  We must continue to seek that practical, day-to-day salvation that comes from Christ living in us.

The Bible gives us principles to live by, and those principles are reliable and important.  But apart from Christ, those principles become instruments of death in our fleshly hands.    We got principles at Mount Sinai; if that was all we needed, Jesus didn’t need to come and die.

We needed rescue.  Jesus provided it for us, and He continues to provide it, if we will walk with Him.  My charge to you is to do just that.  Do not make your life a Pharisaical concoction of divinely revealed principles and fleshly application of those principles.  Rather, seek the rescue that Christ provides, abide in Him, and through Him those same principles will become life-giving tools in your hands, which you can incarnate in the world as Christ’s Body, the very Image of God.


The Incarnate Church

3 January 2010

We are sinful people living in a broken world; the days are evil.  Evil days bring many temptations: some people are just waiting for it to be over, just hanging on by their fingernails until they die or the rapture comes.  Others delude themselves into a false cheer, a Pollyana view of the world where they pretend that the days are not evil at all.  Others—especially political conservatives—fall into the temptation perfectionism.  They proceed to take the evil days as an excuse to complain about everything, and their shrill voices fill the airwaves.  If we succumb to those temptations, we are fools who use the evil days as an excuse not to redeem the time.  The charge this week is simple enough: be wise.  Redeem the time because the days are evil.  Now is our chance to sing heartily, to each other and to God.  Now is the time to be grateful for everything.  Now is the time to submit to each other’s needs and care for one another.  Whatever we do, let’s do it thankfully, caringly, and singing to each other and the Lord.

We can do this because we are Christ’s body, connected to our Head who has already won His victory on the earth, which will one day be covered with the knowledge of God’s glory like water covers the sea.  The question is not how we can sing, but how can we not?

We are Christians; we are Christ’s body, and Christ’s body sings.  So sing!


The Shadow of Rome: Many Evangelicals Hold Old Catholic Beliefs

30 December 2009

Nicea.

Chalcedon.

Ain’t it awful?


The Incarnation and the Church

27 December 2009

As we have pursued a more formal approach to worship, I have had occasion to formulate a compact charge to the congregation at the close of the service.  Barring the necessity for some specific application to be kept in-house, I will be sharing these charges here.  Below is the charge from this week:

When we sit at the Lord’s Table, Christ teaches us that we eat and drink Christ: He says “This is My body; This is My blood.”

You are what you eat.  To eat and drink the body and blood of Christ is to be the body and blood of Christ in the world.

As Christ allowed His body to be broken and His blood to be shed to purchase life for the world, so He will allow His church to be spent for the life of the world.  Your job—and my charge to you this week—is to reflect that mission in your own life.  Go out and minister the healing of Jesus of Nazareth, first to your brothers and sisters in the body, then to a world that is sick unto death in body and soul.  Do not delude yourself that this will have no cost.  It will cost you your life. But you have already died with Christ.  It is no longer you who live, but Christ lives in you, and you cling to Him, trusting Him to love you, and love others through you.


The Incarnation in Your Life Today

25 December 2009

The charge from this past Sunday’s sermon follows:

Gregory the Theologian said, “What is not assumed cannot be healed,” and this is true.  For exactly that reason, Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Triune God, assumed full humanity at His incarnation.  In Jesus, we have a spectacular demonstration that man, the image of God, is an accurate image, and can partake in the divine nature.  Nothing human is foreign to Him; there is no part of you that you can point to and say, “Jesus didn’t have to deal with this.”

The Incarnation strips us of our excuses, but in exchange it gives us hope, hope that we can be holy as He is holy.  God designed every part of you to partake of the divine nature.   God in Christ redeemed every part of you in order to cause you to fulfill God’s design.  In the coming week, you will face the temptation to keep parts of yourself, or parts of your life, to yourself, and to keep the divine nature away from them.  The charge I leave you with is simple: Don’t give in to that temptation.  Hand that area to Christ, so that you may say with Paul, “I no longer live, but Christ lives in me.”


A Liturgy Or Two

21 December 2009

I know there are several of you who read this site because I post on liturgy from time to time, and I owe you folks an update.  I haven’t posted on liturgy in a while, and it’s not because I’ve been dormant.  We had reached the stage in the life of the church where our discussions of liturgy were becoming very particular to our own individual concerns.  It didn’t seem appropriate to share all of that with the world, so I haven’t.

What I can share are the results.  Some potential points of interest, in no particular order:

  • We are using the 5-C covenant renewal pattern cribbed from Jeff Myers’ excellent The Lord’s Service.  This is not the result of a solid theological commitment on our part, but we have to do everything in some order.  We picked this order on the principle that it makes sense, and given the choice between a sensible order that we might not have to change much and a cobbled-together pastiche that we know we’ll have to fix, we prefer the former.  We’ll examine it more closely as time permits, and of course it’s all up for grabs at that point, but ya gotta start somewhere…
  • Page numbers for songs are from Cantus Christi, unless otherwise noted.  (Note that verse numbers will also be different from one hymnal to the next.  Particularly in Cantus, where the editors have a definite antiquarian streak.)
  • The opening prayer is inspired by the Book of Common Prayer, and edited as seemed appropriate.
  • The confession and petition prayers were drafted corporately, the former based on Nehemiah’s confession for the nation and the latter based on a grocery list of things we should pray for. We know there are going to be problems here.  Be interesting to find out what they will be.
  • The fact that everybody is reading a scripted prayer together is not one of the problems.  More about this later, but here’s the short version: (1) teamwork requires coordination; (2) nobody complains about this when corporately singing to the Lord; (3) why is it a problem when corporately speaking to Him?
  • We left the “c-word” in the Creed, with no apologies.  We mean it when we say we believe in the holy catholic church, and we also mean the unspoken “and they don’t!” that comes with it.  In this we stand with the Reformed and Anglican portions of the Protestant heritage, as over against the Lutheran tradition, which chickened out.
  • Weekly communion, yes.  Grape juice thus far.

So, without further ado, here is our very first attempt at formal liturgy.

We knew we were going to need to tweak it, but we weren’t sure how.  A few things became clear once we’d actually done it once, and here are a few of them:

  • The petition prayer was composed without any regard for cadence or ease of corporate reading.  This is entirely my fault, because getting it into final shape was my job.  The content, if I do say so myself, is pretty good.  But it’s ugly, and it shouldn’t be.  Although I have no doubt that I can fix it, this is not a kind of writing I’ve done before, so it’s going to be a process.
  • That prayer is also really, really long.  We may shorten it a bit.
  • There is such a thing as too fast.  In my zeal to keep the corporate portions from dragging–come on, you know what I’m talking about–I led us through at a breakneck pace.  This is a Bad Thing, because if people can barely get the words out of their mouth in time, then they have little chance of absorbing them.  Must slow down.  Happily, we have the time to do this.
  • Four songs in a row is too many, especially in a congregation that’s not accustomed to a lot of singing.  Need to break this up into more manageable chunks.
  • My local Stater Brothers doesn’t sell matzoh, or anything else much in the way of unleavened bread.  This may not sound relevant, but when you’re out shopping for a communion bread that you can actually break instead of those awful little square white things, it matters.  Must find a local source.

We went back to the drawing board and tweaked a bit.  Here’s the second version.

Comments and critiques are of course welcome.