In the preceding post, I concluded by claiming that an abstract proposition is not the story “boiled down to essentials” because God made the world ex nihilo, entered it Himself in a body, and will resurrect it all one day.
Why would I say that?
God made the world. Created it all from nothing, spoke it into existence. In that world, things happen. God enters into the world He made and acts within it. God put us in that world — this world — and we act within it. This is what really happens. The stories are accounts of what really happened. The abstractions are short summaries or interpretations of what really happened — but it’s the happening itself that is the reality.
When we say that “by grace you are saved through faith” is the gospel, stripped down to bare essentials with all the extraneous information left out, we are saying that it’s the idea — make that Idea — that matters, and not the incarnational reality. We are moving, in other words, from Yahweh’s world to Plato’s.
This is a problem, because Plato’s world doesn’t exist.
Yahweh made dirt. The Word of Yahweh became flesh and dwelt among us, and got dirt under His fingernails. In the resurrection, redeemed men will get redeemed dirt under their redeemed fingernails, and glory to God for all of it.
Abstractions, important a tool as they are, are not the thing itself. They always leave out the dirt.