Holy Anger?

16 December 2025

Where does the concept of righteous indignation come from? Is it even biblical?

My friend Drew interviewed Brant Hansen a while back, and on his recommendation, I watched the video. Hansen proposes that righteous human anger simply doesn’t exist. We see God’s anger in the Scriptures, and obviously it’s righteous when He does it, but Hansen says humans simply cannot be righteously angry, and the only thing to do with anger is get rid of it.

There are problems with this proposal, which we’ll get to, but I want to commend the interview to you anyway. There’s a lot of pastoral horse sense on display there. Hansen very effectively skewers a number of the sins we commit around anger, and shows up our shabby excuses for what they are. It really is true that we want our anger to be righteous far more often than it really is, and Hansen has a lot to contribute here. I particularly liked his dissection of outrage at people you know well: “You really can’t believe your mom would say something like that? She’s been saying those things for 78 years! I think it’s time to believe it!”

So watch the interview for the pastoral wisdom and sharp observation, but don’t adopt his theology. Hansen’s proposal has three major problems, one exegetical, one theological, one physiological.

The exegetical problem: Hansen observes, correctly, that a lot of people seem to have the first half of Eph. 4:26 memorized (“Be angry and do not sin”), but neglect the last half (“Do not let the sun go down on your anger.”) That really is a problem. Anger goes rotten quickly, and God requires us to deal with it quickly. He’s not wrong about that. However, he tries to rectify the problem by attending to the second half and neglecting the first, which still says what it says (and is quoting Psalm 4, so there’s more Scripture to work through there as well.) Based on the command “Do not let the sun go down on your anger,” Hansen argues that anger is sinful and the only thing to do is get rid of it. This is a bit like claiming that because we need to wash our clothes, it’s wrong to wear them to start with. The same author who said “put your anger away” in v. 26b and 31 also said to have it and not sin in v. 26a. In neglecting half the revelation on the topic, Hansen is just like the people he’s criticizing.

If the command is “Be angry and do not sin,” then by God’s grace there’s a way to do it. That means that there is such a thing as human anger that’s not sin, even if only temporarily. Psalm 4, which Paul is quoting, walks us through how to think and pray through the anger righteously and ultimately let it go.

Hansen will go on to build the rest of his whole case on the claim that there’s no *biblical* argument for human righteous anger—but the biblical case for it is staring him right in the face in Eph. 4:26 and Psalm 4:4.

The theological problem is that Hansen dismisses the biblical discussions of Jesus’ anger with the old “He’s God; you’re not” excuse. This is the practical version of a serious christological heresy. Jesus didn’t show us a life that’s unattainable for us because He’s God and we’re not; we can’t appeal to Jesus’ divinity to beg off following His example. He laid aside His divine prerogatives and showed us what a fully submitted human life actually looks like. If Jesus handled His anger without sin, then it’s my job to handle my anger without sin, too.

The physiological problem is with Hansen’s claim that “anything you can do angry you can do better not angry.” (Which he got from Dallas Willard, if I’m recalling correctly.) They’re just wrong about this. Susceptibility to this error is a function of class. If you live your life behind a keyboard, anger doesn’t do much for you: it clouds your higher critical faculties and fine motor coordination in a way that’s not helpful when you’re trying to use your words. Talking or typing, anger isn’t a big help, and calm goes a lot further.

But all of life is not talking and typing. Anger gives an instant shot of raw physical strength that isn’t easily come by another way (especially for men; the effect is different for women—less pronounced, but lasts a lot longer). People who don’t understand how that could be valuable are blessed to have never needed it. As a trauma therapist and self-defense instructor, I regularly work with people who have needed it, and for some of them, it’s saved their lives.

Hansen is an acute observer of the human condition, and his errors in this area have made him an especially unsparing critic of our sins around anger. In this, he is performing a valuable service to the Body, and I would encourage you to listen to the interview and absorb what is useful in it. We really do sin with anger often.

That said, God made human anger. Anger is a reflection of the divine nature in us; it is a potent gift as language and sexuality are potent gifts. Like them, anger hurts us when we don’t attend to the instructions God gave about how to handle it. That’s no excuse for dismissing it entirely.


When Protocols Fail

9 December 2025

A friend of a friend recently asked me to explain a little about what I do. This seems to be what came out…

Greetings X,

Our mutual friend tells me that you don’t quite know what questions to ask. I sympathize; I have the same problem a lot of the time. Let me see if I can help get the conversation started.  I believe she told you her experience with my work. What I can tell you about that experience, from my side, is that humans are used to being looked at, but we are not accustomed to being seen. When I make myself entirely present to another person, I often know more than I “should” know about the problem, and my hands seem to find their way to helpful places. 

In the same way you can get someone to wash their own face by putting them in front of a mirror, sometimes the human body fixes itself when it’s invited to notice itself. It is very often the case that when I lay on hands and make myself truly present, without doing much of anything, my client’s system responds by reorganizing itself in more healthy ways. There are certainly techniques and disciplines and lots of practice time involved, but how much is human ability and how much divine intervention I couldn’t really say. But then, God never intended us to exercise our abilities without Him, did He?

As to how I might be able to help you, or what your session would look like, I’m afraid I don’t know for certain. Here’s what I can tell you: I will be present. You will of course be present. God will be present. You will be involved, and you don’t have to do anything you don’t want to. I am not a mechanic and you are not a car; this is not something I can do to you; this is something we will do together with God’s help.

The value of direct obedience to biblical teaching is hard to overestimate; I expect to pray, lay on hands, anoint with oil. I usually work general to specific, so I’ll likely begin by establishing contact with your system at your shoulders or your feet, noticing the pulses and rhythms in your body, looking for unusual tensions or movements in your visceral cavity or anything out of balance or that draws my attention for some reason. 

From there, we will proceed as seems best to us and the Spirit.

I know that’s not a particularly satisfying answer. It would be nice to give you a definite protocol, some kind of road map for what comes next. But the people with protocols are telling you they can’t find anything wrong. I’m the guy you call when you’re off the edge of the map, and still have to navigate the territory. I don’t have a map either, but I live here, so that’s something.

I didn’t set out to be this person. When God called me into ministry as a junior in high school, I had a picture in my head of what that would entail: an expository preaching ministry in a suburban Bible church. To that end I earned a bachelor’s in Bible, then a Th.M in New Testament. During seminary, I interned in a suburban Bible church in eastern Washington, training in exactly the kind of expository ministry I expected to pursue for the rest of my life. Upon graduation, I worked as a pastor and seminary instructor.

Then Jesus mugged me, and not for the first time. The first time was when He gave me to faithful Christian parents. I came to know Him early, and hardly remember a time when I did not know Jesus as my Savior. The second time was when, as a very angry 16-year-old, I found my life unlivable, and God taught me to forgive. I came to know Him then as a worker of miracles, the one who made me able to forgive when I simply didn’t have the ability.

This time around, the mugging took the form of a surprise: the small suburban Bible church I thought I was planting turned out to be an exit ministry for people leaving a cult. By the time I realized what I had gotten into, I had bonded to the people and didn’t want to quit. Getting the people out of the cult was hard, but doable. Getting the cult out of the people…well, that was another matter. Fast-forward several years, and this teaching pastor and professor had become, of necessity, a pastoral counselor, worship leader, liturgist, and church history teacher. God was just getting started. 

He brought me next to Englewood, and over a period of years and a series of gigs in youth and city ministry, He taught me to obey some verses that, although I’d known them all my life, I’d never quite seen, if you know what I mean. I learned to sing the Psalms. I learned to pray in the manner of the Lord’s Prayer. I learned to tangibly love my literal neighbors. I learned to rejoice, for real, when people slandered me. 

And then God began drawing my attention to a series of passages that talk about laying hands on the sick, praying for healing, anointing with oil. I’m sure you know the passages as well as I do, but for me suddenly the question bubbled up: why don’t we do these things? What would happen if we did? 

Not too long after that, He led me to enroll in massage therapy school. The entire endeavor was ridiculous; I couldn’t afford the money or the time for even the shortest, cheapest program. I told Him “If we’re doing this, then You’re paying for it, and since I know You can afford anything, I’m going to the best school in Denver.” And you know what? He made it happen. 

Massage therapy led to Trauma Touch Therapy, Craniosacral Therapy, and an assortment of other modalities, and along the way I learned a few very important things. 

  1. Human attention heals. When one person–the whole person, body and spirit–sets all distractions aside and rests the full weight of their attention on another person, it is amazing how people can heal, even before anyone does anything. It seems that our systems adjust spontaneously in response to being really seen. 
  2. God shows up. His priorities are not mine; He doesn’t always do what I want Him to. But He always shows up, and He always works.  
  3. American Christians need a radical worldview revision. 

That last one was a real kick in the teeth. Most of us live like the world is what the materialists say it is — matter in motion — and then we add an overlay of heaven, hell, biblical miracles, resurrection, and so on. We’re basically materialists with a whitelist of exceptions that allow us to be meaningfully Christian. But no. The world was spoken into existence and is upheld by the Word of God’s power. Even matter isn’t what the materialists think it is; still less the human person. 

Genesis 2 says God made us out of dust and breath; we are a divinely forged union of body and spirit. When I lay my hands on another person, I’m never just touching a body. That fact raises an interesting question. If you have a sore back, obviously my body can work on your body for your benefit. Can my spirit work on your spirit? The materialists think it’s a nonsense question, but it isn’t, is it? 

I pray. I lay on hands. I anoint with oil. God shows up. This is either the church’s first and worst attempt at healing, a primitive medicine long since overshadowed by modern science, or it is a healing ministry God gave to the church, something we should never have stopped doing. 

I think it’s the latter. I invite you to come and find out for yourself.

Blessings, 

Tim


Introducing Humans

31 July 2025

I don’t usually announce our church podcast episodes here, but this past week’s episode focused on Genesis 2:4-7, and is right on point for our focus on physicality.

You can find it here, or wherever you procure fine podcasts.


Guest Essay: School of Play

7 June 2025

The essay below is a guest post by a young friend of mine. In our reflections on Christian physicality, we frequently forget to think specifically about the implications of the fact that schoolchildren have bodies. Owen weighs in with a message we’d do well to reflect on.


School of Play

by Owen Coffman

Angela Browning, founder of Recess for All Florida Students, said her kids started coming home from school in tears a few years ago, complaining that the day had been too long and that they’d had no time to play with friends. At the time, they were getting 10 minutes of recess twice a week, she said. This year, with 20 minutes of recess each day, their response has been different. Health organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that children should be given at least 60 minutes of recess per day. Why do kids get such a minimal amount of time to do what they want? Nobody questions the fact that adults need breaks during a work day. Kids have far more energy, less developed brains, and haven’t yet built the social skills they will need to thrive as adults. It is intuitive that they would need free time to move, think, play, and interact with their peers. School is very structured. Kids have to sit quietly, take notes, and keep their bodies still. In most classes, they are spending their time listening, not contributing. Interacting with friends is discouraged. Obviously these rules are in place for a reason, intending to help students learn. Teachers are urged to give their students all the information needed to pass their standardized tests, keep their schools open, and measure up to students in other countries academically. This in turn puts pressure on students to keep their grades up, remember everything, and ultimately succeed. However, kids are only able to keep these difficult behaviors up for a time before they need a break to move their bodies, interact with friends, or even just sit alone and think. Many school officials and administrators downplay the importance of recess for kids because they assume it is a waste of time and kids would be better employed studying. They often feel that a few extra minutes spent teaching a subject will improve academic outcomes more than the same amount of time spent in unstructured play. However, this is not actually what the research has shown. Children get higher grades, solve personal problems better, improve their fitness, and develop confidence and independence, all as direct benefits of longer recess.   

Maybe the most obvious to spot are the physical benefits of recess. According to US News and World Report, “The average (American) child sits for 8.5 hours a day. Combine that with high-calorie foods, and weight gain is inevitable, researchers say. But studies show that at least 20 minutes of recess daily, along with 150 minutes of physical education a week, make a measurable difference in children’s weight.” In a country where children’s obesity rates are growing, implementing recess could have a big impact. In the same article, author Kate Rix points out “Letting kids run fast will help them develop coordination. Running up the slide may not be as unsafe as it looks. And even falling… is something kids need to practice to avoid getting badly hurt.” Challenging their physical abilities makes kids stronger, faster, more coordinated, and improves stamina. Recess isn’t the only way to reap all of these benefits, but it is a good place to start. Students will feel motivated to improve in an environment with friends. Most boys and many girls are naturally competitive with each other and physical activities are a better place for kids to compete than on video game scores, social media followers, or test results. Pull up competitions, jump rope high score, or a game of capture the flag are all appropriate outlets for competitive spirit. Aside from being a channel for kids to burn energy and compete, games at recess are an opportunity to try out new things. Children often lack space, time, or friends after school which leaves  recess as their only time to be introduced to new things and expand what they are able to do. A child who throws a frisbee with a friend for 20 minutes will find he can throw more accurately and catch more consistently than when he began. A kid who sets herself a goal of getting across the monkey bars without dropping will get stronger arms and be able to complete the monkey bars, climb a rope swing, or in my brother’s case, climb up the underside of the stairs using only his arms. When kids get home from school, without motivation, they may just pick up a screen. Many parents don’t require or encourage their children to be active when they get home from school, which means it is often up to schools to provide them with a place to be active and grow in physical ability.  

“Quality physical education along with daily recess are necessary components of the school curriculum that enable students to develop physical competence, health-related fitness, self responsibility, and enjoyment of physical activity so that they can be physically active for a lifetime,” the groups wrote in a position paper about elementary school recess in 2001.(Time Magazine) Not only do schools enforce activity in PE class, they can be the place where kids find movement fun during recess. There is something inherently more exciting about playing and competing with people your age. Classmates can build each other up, have friendly competition, and enable games that can’t be played at home due to lack of space, equipment, or teammates. 

Learning a skill at a young age and enjoying it will build a foundation for wanting to do it for the rest of life. A young kid whose dad takes him golfing will be more likely to golf as an older adult to stay in shape and have fun. Kids who play tennis in middle school might as a fifty year old pick up pickleball. 

The physical benefits of recess are all pretty obvious, but what about the social upshots of a longer unstructured time for children during a normal school day? Everything about school is precisely structured. Kids aren’t able to interact with each other except for during recess. Children will grow in independence and toughness, learn how to regulate themselves emotionally, solve conflicts with peers, socialize, and develop teamwork skills during recess. Knowing how to socialize is important for all kids and it is impossible to learn in a class.  

Recess helps kids develop independence and toughness. Inevitably, kids get minor injuries like scrapes and bruises playing outside during recess and have to learn how to get back up. Kids don’t want to miss recess and most will want to keep playing even if they are in pain, so they have an incentive to get back up and keep playing. Kids often encourage each other to push through minor pain so they can finish a game. During recess, children are supervised but less closely than indoors. They usually get to make choices about what to play and are allowed to devise their own rules for a game. This might be the only time in a weekday that kids get to choose what they want to do, and practicing these skills at recess leads to greater confidence and independence. Kids will also gain confidence when they discover that they are growing in a particular skill. A kid who doubled the length of his frisbee throw can feel elated and proud of his accomplishment. The girl who jumps ropes at recess and learns how to touch the ground between jumps and retain her balance will feel more confident to try other tricks with her rope. 

Independence and toughness are not the only social benefits of longer recess. Students also learn how to interact with their peers, practice getting along, and regulate their own emotions during recess. This is the time that kids are free to choose something they want to do in their time. Without a teacher hovering over them to make sure everyone follows the rules, they have the chance to learn to cooperate and compromise. There is an incentive to do so because very few kids would have fun spending time sitting alone. When you want someone to play with you or do something with you, you normally try to find common ground that suits both. Kids might try to be nice to someone to encourage them to play. For all these same reasons, kids have a motivation to learn to control their temper. It’s not fun to play with someone who will blow up at the slightest problem. Kids instinctively understand that and will try to maintain calm in order to have fun with their classmates or finish a game. 

“Asking other kids to play, explaining the rules of a complex game and hashing out disputes are all important life lessons that kids can only learn if they’re given time to play. Recess also offers the chance for children to strengthen their leadership and negotiation skills, and it can prevent bullying. Kids love playing—and when a conflict arises, it pushes children to practice these vital social skills so they can get back to having fun.” (Rasmussen University) Teamwork is a vital part of adult life and it is a skill best learned at a young age. According to Robert Murray, the former chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics Council on School Health “Recess is the only place in school, maybe the only place in their social life, where kids have the opportunity to develop social skills with their peers,” These social skills are of utmost importance at every stage of life from getting along at work, making new friends, and being part of a community. “When you think about adults, we value and treasure those social skills in our coworkers – things like negotiation and the ability to communicate and have peer-to-peer interaction as a team member,” he also said. “All of those things are really worked out on the playground peer-to-peer, not teacher-to-child, not parent-to-child, but child-to-child.” Loosely supervised play time might be the only time for kids to develop lifelong skills relevant throughout their entire adult lives. In other words, you hope your coworkers had recess growing up. 

When kids get to move their bodies, another result is better attention in the classroom. “After recess for children, or after a corresponding break time for adolescents, students are more attentive and better able to perform cognitively,” says the American Academy of Pediatrics. When students get a break from staring at a textbook or listening to a teacher, they will come back to the subject with improved attention. This actually allows them to accomplish more than if they had studied the whole time. The AAP policy statement goes on to state “The science shows pretty clearly that taking those breaks in the day makes students better able to encode memory and learn and perform academically.” Students will not only be able to focus better in the classroom, but will be able to remember and recall what they have learned. If encoding memory, learning, and academic performance are the fundamental goals of education in America, recess is a critical tool to help educators achieve their purpose. The strange thing is, one of the reasons recess is getting cut from many schools across America is because of government regulations. Recess times across the country began to decline rapidly after the No Child Left Behind Act, which was designed to help American kids keep up academically with those of other nations. In this policy, the government installed achievement goals in standardized tests. If a school’s test scores were poor, they would be subject to a series of penalties, including loss of funding. It is no wonder that schools began to question whether recess was a waste of time. Yet, research shows that kids who get more recess perform at a higher level in school. Statistics aside, be honest, would you feel mentally refreshed if you spent hours sitting in a classroom without a break? American kids simply do not get enough time for recess, which is critical for their  improvement in fitness and coordination, development of social skills, and success in school. The physical benefits of recess are immense. Kids will gain endurance, strength, and coordination while learning to enjoy new activities. While socializing and developing teamwork, they will build independence and toughness. Kids need a mental break, and when they don’t get it, they lose their attention span, forget their lessons, have difficulty concentrating resulting in lower grades. By giving students the opportunity to use their bodies and change their focus, teachers actually improve memory, recall, and attention in the classroom. Following the recommendations for recess will improve student outcomes and allow schools to meet the standards necessary to succeed. Perhaps most importantly, recess is vital for kids because they will learn skills that they are not learning anywhere else. In short, recess is the necessary preparation for successful life as an adult. It helps people grow into all the skills needed to live a productive, happy life later on. Teamwork, cooperation, and compromise are necessary skills for working with others. Enjoyment of a variety of physical activities will develop hobbies and fitness for later in life. And intellectual achievement will lay the groundwork for success in college, on-the-job training, and the continued education needed to make an enjoyable career. So come on you all, give ‘em some RECESS. 

Works Cited

Reilly, Katie “Is Recess Important for Kids or a Waste of Time? Here’s What the  Research Says” Time Magazine  23 October 2017 time.com/4982061/recess-benefits-research-debate Date Accessed 13 April 2025

Rix, Kate. “How Much Recess Should Kids Get?” US News World Report  14 October 2022. www.usnews.com/education/k12/articles/how-much-recess-should-kids-get Date Accessed 15 April 2025

“10 Reasons Kids Should Have Longer Recess at School” Recess Guardians 25 March 2022 www.recessguardians.org/post/design-a-stunning-blog Date Accessed 15 April 2025

Potts, Monica “Recess is Good for Kids. Why Don’t More States Require It?” Five Thirty Eight 23 March 2023 fivethirtyeight.com/features/recess-is-good-for-kids-why-dont-more-states-require-it Date Accessed 16 April 2025 

Thompson, Hannah R. and London, Rebecca A. “Not All Fun and Games: Disparities in School Recess Persist, and Must Be Addressed” National Library of Medicine pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319329 Date Accessed 9 April 2025

Murray, Robert et All. “The Crucial Role of Recess in School” American Academy of Pediatrics Volume 131, Issue 1. 1 January 2013. publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/131/1/183/30893/The-Crucial-Role-of-Recess-in-School? Date Accessed 13 April 2025

Brooks, Ashley. “The Importance of Recess: Why Schools Need More Playtime” Rasmussen University  20 June 2022 www..rasmussen.edu/degrees/education/blog/importance-of-recess Date Accessed 14 April 2025

“Recess Helps Kids Learn Better in School” American Heart Association 29 January 2016 www.heart.org/en/news/2018/05/01/recess-helps-kids-learn-better-in-school Date Accessed 12 April 2025


Got That List From Demons

9 July 2024

I recently found myself once again in a conversation about yoga. We’ve discussed that (and yoga’s history) here before, but in this case, the question specifically centered on the postures involved in modern yoga practice. “Isn’t it true,” the questioner wanted to know, “that certain postures are worshipping a particular Hindu god (i.e., a demon)?”

It’s a good question to raise, and the answer is no. Some Hindus say that particular poses mean you’re worshipping some specific god. Silly Christians believe the false prophets of the demons rather than their own Scriptures, which tell us that “the earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness” and “the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.” I can’t believe I need to say this, but I heartily recommend believing the Bible, not the demons!*

Certainly some demon — let’s take Hanuman for example — might proclaim dominion over some posture or another. As it happens there is a posture in yoga called “Hanuman’s posture” (Sanskrit hanumanasana). It’s essentially a front split with the arms reaching straight up. Is it the case that every gymnast who’s ever done a front split is unknowingly worshipping Hanuman? Don’t be ridiculous.

“But it’s not just a front split,” says the suspicious Christian. “See the arms reaching up? Is that praying hands I see?”

Let me tell you why the arms are reaching up: the fascial network. Specifically, in this case, reaching up helps open the superficial and deep front lines. Better yet, let me show you. You don’t even need to do a split for this. Get into a deep lunge, with the right leg back. As deep as you can reasonably manage. Now, look straight up, and reach straight up (or maybe even slightly back) with both arms. Feel that additional stretch and opening through your right front ribs, abdominals, hip, and quads? That’s why.

Now, can someone use this posture to worship Hanuman? Of course! Might it even be standard practice among Hanuman-worshippers? I suppose it could. Is it therefore true that everyone who adopts this posture into their exercise is worshipping Hanuman? Of course not. Hanuman might claim that is the case, of course, but Hanuman is a liar just like all the other demons. There’s no reason why we–indwelt by the Holy Spirit as we are–ought to take them seriously. Certainly you can sin with your body (stealing, committing adultery, and the like), but we know those things are sins because God told us so. You will search the Scriptures in vain for some divinely sanctioned list of postures that irrevocably belong to demons and are off-limits to Christians. Yoga’s Christian despisers claim to have such a list, but they got that list from demons. The truth is that if it’s healthy for your body, it’s fair game, to the glory of God. “Glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”

*This recommendation would fuel a variety of inflammatory statements if I cared to make them. Can you imagine if I took to Twitter to say, “The problem with Dave Hunt is that he trafficks in demonic revelation rather than Scripture”??? But in this case, it’s true, isn’t it?


Seven Laws of (Magical) Reality

22 June 2024

One of the major projects before us as a church in the 21st-century WEIRD (Western, Educated, Individualistic, Rich, Democratic) world is repenting of our concessions to modernism, and returning to the worldview of the Bible. I know you’re thinking “We’ve been on top of this Christian worldview thing since Francis Schaeffer,” but no, we haven’t. Schaeffer made a great start. Ministries like Summit have done wonders for us. But we have a long way to go yet to recover a truly biblical grasp of the world and our place in it. I have something that will help: a “sort-of-manifesto” for Bnonn and Smokey Tennant’s podcast True Magic, laying out their founding principles, which (spoiler alert) are as follows:

  1. Physical things participate in spiritual patterns.
  2. Physical things therefore have meaning.
  3. We participate in the same spiritual patterns at different levels.
  4. There is an order of being that flows down from God.
  5. Heaven and earth participate together in Man.
  6. Therefore, Man must live liturgically.
  7. To live liturgically, we must study both Man and Scripture.

I’ll let you read their elaboration on each of the principles for yourself. Suffice to say, this is the kind of thinking we need to be doing more of.


Bodywork and the Dominion Mandate

12 March 2024

For those of you who don’t know, I went back to school when I was 40. I had a Bachelor’s in Biblical Studies, a 4-year Th.M. in New Testament, and was working in my field. I expected to spend the rest of my life in the study and classroom, doing exegetical work more or less full-time. Going to massage therapy school…it was unexpected to say the least. But God has an infinite capacity to surprise.

I remain a theologian, and I want to be able to offer a theological account of what’s going on as I work with a client. By comparison with the exegete’s calling, stepping out to theologize about what happens on the massage table felt a lot like walking a tightrope across the Grand Canyon with no net.

Several years into it, I have come to understand that my task is not all that different from any other field. We all plow the fertile fields of general revelation; we just don’t think of it that way. We think in terms of “It works” or “That’s just how you do it.” For example, as a teacher, I had no difficulty showing a new preacher how to set up a 3-point topical sermon. That’s certainly not a particularly biblical structure, but it’s hardly unbiblical. It’s craft knowledge, discovered by working in my calling and paying attention to what works and what does not. The 3-point topical outline just works, and it gives newbies a starting point. There are any number of other teacher tricks — use of slides and visual aids, intelligent use of assignments, questions, discussion, and so on — that are likewise discovered in the doing, and then passed from master to apprentice, down the generations. I learned many of them from my teachers, discovered some on my own, and I pass them on to my students in their turn.

The same dynamic of craft knowledge applies to everything. Scripture tells us much, and it is authoritative. But in most fields of endeavor, special revelation walks us right up to the edge of the field, legitimizing the inquiry — and there it leaves us to explore. Scripture teaches us that the physical creation is real, and good, and worthy of our study, and then leaves us to study it. It doesn’t tell us that the oak tree has several different kinds of tissue in it, nor that all those tissues are composed of complex molecules, nor that those molecules are composed of atoms, nor that the atoms are made of protons, neutrons and electrons, nor that those particles break down into still more elemental particles, and so on. All that, we have to find out by examining the oak tree. Where Scripture speaks about the oak tree, all that it says is true, but it doesn’t speak to every question we have. For many questions, Scripture gives us warrant for the examination, but it doesn’t tell us what we’re going to find.

And so it is with my work. Scripture tells me that the body is real, that it can be ill or healthy. It does say some things about the factors involved (e.g., “A merry heart doeth good like medicine.”) But there’s a lot it doesn’t tell us about how to get it from illness to health: treating specific infectious diseases, setting bones, making medicines, correcting postural imbalances, releasing visceral restrictions. That, we have to learn by exploring the fertile fields of God’s general revelation in the world. And by consistent and careful examination, by honest experiment, we have learned a whole lot — and we have a lot more to learn.

Likewise, Scripture tells me that the spirit is real. So why wouldn’t the same kind of craft knowledge dynamic apply to working with the spirit? Of course we start with what God has given us, but then we learn by experience from there. (If that sounds hazardous, try not learning from experience, and see where that gets you!)

For pretty much any subject, I find the best way to begin is at the beginning, which is to say, in Genesis. The foundations of biblical anthropology are in those first few chapters. We first learn that we are designed to be God’s miniature self-portrait, His signature on the work of art that is the universe, which means we — male and female as a team — are responsible to cultivate and guard the world. Thus far the first chapter. In the second chapter, we discover our composition: God compounded man from dust and breath. Dust is the material part that returns to the earth when we die. Breath is the immaterial part, the spirit that returns to God who gave it. But crucially, in the expression “dust and breath,” what is meant by “and”? There’s a complex interaction between the physical and spiritual, and there’s a lot there we don’t really understand.

Our exploration of the dust and only take us so far. It is now beyond scientific question that living cells respond to very subtle influences — magnetic fields long thought to be so weak as to be indistinguishable from background noise, for example, or electromagnetic inputs as small as a single photon. It turns out that the human hands generate magnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation that is certainly strong enough for a body to respond at the cellular level. (See Oschman, Energy Medicine: The Scientific Basis, 2nd ed., for a look at the physical science. Thanks to Flexner and his blinkered minions, we’re a century behind on research, so it’s maddening in spots, but it’s also really intriguing. This kind of subtle physical phenomena will be one of the things people mean by “energy work.”)  

But as a Christian, I see no reason to stop with the dust — we know there’s more to a human than that! The things which are seen are not made of things which are visible, and we’re not just talking about subatomic particles here — electrons are visible in principle; it just takes a really expensive set of glasses to see them. But behind all that, behind the physical matter and energy, is something…other. Something spiritual in nature, that manifests in physical reality, but is prior to it and cannot be reduced to it.

In the language of the Eastern Church, everything that exists is made of God’s divine energies. Not His essence — that way lies pantheism or panentheism — but His energies, which flow from His being. There was no pre-existing material; it is all made by Him, and it all exists in Him — in Him we live and move and have our being, as the pagans inferred and Paul affirms. All that is, is the spoken word of God. He spoke, and it is, and He upholds all things by the word of His power.

And so when there is a person on my massage table, there is dust and breath, body and spirit. Following the biblical anthropology, I can use my body to work on their body, relaxing hypertonic muscles, waking up hypotonic ones, reorganizing fascia, breaking up unhealthy adhesions, releasing trigger points, mobilizing organs, and so on, right down to (maybe) using my hand’s magnetic field and biophotonic outputs to affect the injured area at a cellular level—but that’s not all. If I can use my body to affect their body, why can’t I use my spirit to affect their spirit?

It seemed a hypothesis worth exploring, at the very least. Upon experimentation, I find that approaching the interaction conscious of both dust and breath makes for a more effective result. Moreover, when I set to work with that intention, and invite God to enter into the work and accomplish His will for my client’s well-being, I find that He shows up, and very interesting things happen. With some clients, all that happens very quietly (because they’re not ready to be prayed over out loud), and with others, I come all the way out of the closet. We pray together, and God often moves in dramatic ways. I’ve seen everything from physical healings to spiritual turnarounds on my table. This is work I was born to do, and in all modesty, I’m good at it — but I’ve seen God do a lot of things that go way beyond anything I could accomplish.

As best I can tell, my work is partly manipulation of the body, partly communication with the body through subtle physical energies that we’re only beginning to understand, partly my spirit working on my client’s spirit in much the same way that my body works on his body, and partly the Holy Spirit (or whatever delegated angelic powers may be at work) responding to my prayer of invitation to do what the client and I are unable to do on our own.

I need to emphasize that the above is a description of my bodywork. I make no guarantees about someone else’s. Insofar as it’s an interaction between two fallen people, it’s certainly possible there will be demonic attack or interference, and some practitioners openly invite it, addressing the demons by name. Others address themselves to “the universe,” which is sending your request into the spirit world addressed “To Whom It May Concern” — a dangerous practice if ever there were one. Lots of entities out there that might answer that request, and not all of them friendly. Some seem to address their requests to God without quite knowing who they’re talking to — “to the unknown god,” as it were. It is my pleasure, in that instance, to make the introductions. As with Paul’s experience in Athens, I find that most people aren’t too excited to have the veil of divine anonymity ripped away. But some want to hear more, and they’re the ones I came for.

The possibility of demonic intervention makes a lot of Christians nervous, and they want to be able to set up some kind of wall to separate our work from the bad stuff. A lot of people want that separation to be a matter of technique, as if you could photograph the difference between a prophet of Yahweh and a shaman — but no. There are doctrines of demons, but we don’t differentiate our teachers from theirs by their teaching techniques; we discern the content and results of the teaching. Moses and Jambres both threw a staff on the ground that became a snake, both poured out water that became blood. It’s not the technique that distinguishes us; it’s which outlet your power cord is plugged into. That leaves us with no escape from the task of actual discernment. But in my experience, the difference between God and a demon is not particularly subtle.

In my practice, I work spirit-to-spirit under God’s authority, and by His leading. The Scriptures lead me to expect that this might be a fruitful endeavor, practiced in service to Christ and under His Lordship, and I find that it is. I have seen wounded bodies restored and broken hearts healed. Some of that work was a stunning demonstration of human possibility. Some if it was plainly beyond my ability — and yet it happened nonetheless, thanks be to God. As with physical healing, not everything I try works — so I remember what does, and what doesn’t, and next time, I try to do more of what works and less of what doesn’t.

I look forward to growing in craft knowledge as I go. I already have a fairly good stock of knowledge that I couldn’t back up with a verse, any more than I could put a verse behind quenching O1 tool steel at 1475 degrees. But O1 hardens best when quenched at that temperature all the same; the only verse we need is the Dominion Mandate. Likewise for much of what I’ve learned about bodywork. The more I do, the more I learn. I can’t wait to see what God will show me this week!


No Real Discipleship

7 November 2023

For so long as the Holy Spirit restrains the wickedness of the world, culture can only get so bad, and for so long as Messiah tarries, culture can only get so good. We will not descend into the Great Tribulation of our own accord until God permits it, and we cannot ascend to the consummated Kingdom of God of our own accord in any case.

However, between these two great boundary conditions, there is a lot of play, and between these two great boundary conditions, God calls His people “to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.”

The Old Covenant shows us that we cannot do the first two, and the New Covenant shows us that when we do the third, we are given the first two as gifts — a heart of flesh in exchange for a heart of stone, as the prophet said.

This has to include God fulfilling in us His very first command: to tend and keep the earth, the root from which all culture springs. To be engaged in glorious culture-building is a gift God gives His people, and always has. There is no real discipleship without it.


Crypto-Buddhist Christians

23 August 2022

I think of myself as having grown up on the slightly fundamentalist side of normie Evangelicalism, which is true as far as it goes, but I also grew up in a strongly renunciate household. My parents regularly told stories of praying fervently for some particular result, and continuing in prayer for weeks until they reached a point of surrender at which they said “Fine, Lord, I leave it in Your hands entirely. Whatever You choose to do is fine with me” — at which point, the prayers would finally be answered.

Now, those stories were true. This is a thing that God actually did. It was a running theme in both my parents’ lives, and there’s a good lesson to be had here. But the lesson I learned from those stories was seriously unbalanced.

The point — so I thought — was to extinguish my own desires as fast as possible, so that God could work in whatever way He chose. And you know what? Sometimes, that’s exactly what needs to happen. It is entirely possible for me to want my own way so hard that I can’t (or won’t) see what God is really doing. But there’s more to it than that.

I was raised to see God as the boss, and His will as more important than my own — and that’s true, as far as it goes. I was missing the goodness of God, and the goodness of His creation. When I ask God to heal someone, I am asking for a good thing. I’m supposed to want that. When I ask God for the funds to pay a bill, or the wisdom to navigate a sticky relationship, or to save someone’s marriage, these are all good things. There may be a mismatch between God’s timing and mine, or what God wants to do may look different from the picture in my head, but that doesn’t change the goodness of the thing I’m asking for.

There’s a kind of crypto-Buddhist strain of thought that a really good Christian eradicates all desire. We’re typically very selective about where we apply this line of thinking, but in recent years it often rears its ugly head in the guise of accusations about “idolatry of marriage” and “idolatry of family.” These accusations generally come from barren couples, or single folk who object to the way the church centers and normalizes fruitful marriage and family as over against their (sometimes involuntary, but all too often chosen) lifestyle.

We wanted children and weren’t able, so I’m going to speak concretely in those terms. Anybody can turn anything into an idol, and that can be a real concern, but I don’t think that’s what we’re seeing here. What we’re seeing here is a revolt against the way God made the world. Children are a good gift from a good God, and barrenness is an affliction. That is objectively true. “Be fruitful and multiply” is not a suggestion; it is a command, and even a cursory grasp of biology demonstrates that producing children is a major purpose — if not the purpose — of sex.

“But what if we don’t want children?” Doesn’t matter. If you cut off your own foot (rather than, say, losing your foot in an accident), you are just as lame, and lameness is still an affliction. Likewise, if the barrenness is self-inflicted, it is still an affliction. Legs are meant to have feet on them, and a penis and a vagina are meant to meet up and make babies, and designed to do so in a way that’s a lot of fun. These are objective realities that God made; they can’t be wished away by reframing them in the context of our own fallible desires.

So barrenness is like vertigo — if you have it, you ought to seek to rid yourself of it as quickly as possible, and by all lawful means. If it turns out that you can’t, you will have to find a way to live fruitfully despite the debility, but nobody needs to pretend that it’s somehow a good thing. You must submit yourself to God’s Providence, but eradicating your desires is a poor substitute for submission to your Father.

It is not only lawful, it is normal and healthy, to want the good things that God made. We aren’t supposed to be in the business of extinguishing our desires for good things. Buddhism is just wrong about this; desire is not the root of all suffering. Sin is the root of all suffering. The world is broken, and we sometimes have to make our peace with the way, in God’s Providence, that brokenness hurts us.

And so we trust God. We ask Him to end the affliction, and we keep asking, unless, as with Paul, God tells us to stop. And we don’t criticize the people who have — and love — the things that we lack. It is not idolatry to love God’s good gifts. It is idolatry to elevate our own perspective above the objective realities God made.


Exploring the World

9 August 2022

The Scriptures are our authority, but they are not our only source of truth. Nobody learns to drive a stick shift from a Bible study. Or bake a cake. Or clean a wound. Or ask a girl out. Or…

It’s true that there are things we cannot know unless they’re revealed to us. God reveals in Christ, in Scripture, and in the world. The heavens declare the glory of God—it’s right there in the skies; nobody has any excuse for missing it.

Many do miss it, because they want to. And when the pagans tell us what they have discovered about the world, we have to listen with care, because what they give us is always bent toward their agenda—which is justifying not saying “thank you” to Yahweh.

When we embark on our own investigations, thought, we are not hampered in that way. We do want to say thank you. We shall. And we are free to investigate any avenue which may lead us to a grateful understanding of the creation God has given us. So let’s be about it. God has given us a whole world to explore! What little corner of creation will you notice today?